WTO Airbus ruling due Tuesday
Update, March 24, 10:15PM Central European Time:
The reaction to the WTO Final Report at the Aircraft Finance Conference is a Big Yawn, even among Americans here in the Geneva, Switz, venue. As one person with close ties to Boeing put it, “Nobody cares.”
At a briefing we attended Tuesday night about the final report, we didn’t hear anything that meaningfully changed our commentary below.
Original Post:
The Final Report on the US complaint about illegal subsidies to Airbus is due tomorrow (March 23), but it will remain confidential until sometime in April before a public version is released for all to see.
Partisans on both sides of the dispute are already lining up in pre-issuing statements and, in the US case, an orchestrated media campaign touting how dastardly Airbus has been.
Yeah, well, whatever.
We’ve maintained all along that the practical effect of any WTO decision will be pretty much zilch. The Europeans will appeal the decision and, we predict, the appeal will be denied. The US might appeal elements of the decision for which it did not prevail and we think any appeal will likewise be denied.
Meanwhile, the European complaint against Boeing’s “illegal” subsidies will be decided and Boeing is likely to be found to have illegally benefited, too.
More time will pass, the US may appeal and it will be denied.
A political negotiation may or may not ensue.
In the meantime, Airbus will have a definitive path to follow for “launch aid” (or, as Airbus prefers, Reimbursable Launch Investment [RLI]) for the A350. So will China, Russia, Canada, Japan and Brazil for their airplane programs, some of which will compete with Airbus and Boeing. And Boeing will have clarity. Everybody will have clarity about what are legal subsidies. Airbus will have clarity for RLI for its successor airplane to the A320.
No sanctions will be imposed by the US on Airbus, nor by Europe on Boeing. No sanctions will be imposed on other products.
Life will go on. And the politicians will have to find something else to talk about.
Leave a Reply Cancel reply
Twitter Updates
- Odds and Ends: Who’s John Wayne? Air Show musings; Restoring the Dornier 17 dlvr.it/3QK4FJ 1 hour ago
- Odds and Ends: Who's John Wayne? Air Show musings; Restoring the Dornier 17 wp.me/pcvQh-2jX 1 hour ago
- Odds and Ends: Dominating Wide-Bodies; Trying to save the 747-8; Delta waits; China OKs 787 dlvr.it/3Q39xb 1 day ago
Leeham News and Comment
- Odds and Ends: Who’s John Wayne? Air Show musings; Restoring the Dornier 17 May 24, 2013
- Odds and Ends: Dominating Wide-Bodies; Trying to save the 747-8; Delta waits; China OKs 787 May 23, 2013
- Boeing’s McNerney: Interest in 787-10, 777X high; “our airplanes are better than theirs” May 22, 2013
- Odds and Ends: Boeing ponders 787 rate hike; A350 fly-by at PAS?; EMB wins order for E-Jet May 21, 2013
- United returns 787 to service today; WSJ points to other issues May 20, 2013
Associations
Aviation News-Commercial
- Aerospace Industry News
- Air Courier News
- Air Transport Intelligence (subscription)
- Aviation Mainline News
- Aviation Now
- Aviation Press Releases
- Aviation Regional Airlines News
- Aviation Today
- Avitrader News Headlines
- Bill Virgin
- Boeing Frontiers
- Boeing-Focused News Site
- Flight Global
- Jet City Star Analyst Daily
- MSNBC Aviation
- Skycontrol News Headlines
- UBM Aviation Daily News
Aviation News-Defense
Commentaries
- AeroTurboPower
- AirInsight Blog
- AirInsight podcasts
- Aspire Aviation
- Aviation Week blogs
- Blog by Javier
- Boeing Defense blog
- Flying Lessons/Christine Negroni
- Holly Hegemann
- IAG Podcasts
- IAM 751 Blog
- Jon Ostrower
- Lexington Institute (Loren Thompson)
- Plane Talking
- Randy's Journal (Randy Tinseth of Boeing)
- Richard Aboulafia
- Steve Trimble
- Travel Insider
- Uresh Sheth
Companies-Commercial
Companies-Defense
Engines
Resources
TV News Partner
YouTube
Archives
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
- October 2008
- September 2008
- August 2008
- July 2008
- June 2008
- May 2008
- April 2008
- March 2008
- February 2008
It will take some time for Americans to read what the actual report says, until such time they will go around making statements as usual about the subject without knowing what was written.
The Boeing response today on the eve of the report being released is typical of what I expect.
Airbus’ claim of “victory” with regard to the WTO findings makes the Boeing statement look reasonable, no?
You may want to read what Airbus has released:
http://www.airbus.com/en/presscentre/pressreleases/pressreleases_items/2010_03_23_wto_panel_report.html
Most acrticle report on Boeing,Airbus both claiming …
Boeing sputing off loudly in the night just before publication
of the WTO ruling would indicate they knew their victory
was a very, very limited one ( imho actually no victory at all ).
A last bolstering speach for the public just short of ditching the plane
so to speak.
Airbus mentioning government grants for research is certainly
quite interesting in this context.
There are reports that this process can still take years to appeal before any consequences are put in place.
Sounds like a very slow moving process and by the time it is resolved there will no longer be a duopoly in that part of the industry producing smaller ( 100-150) seat planes. The world will change while they are examining the past.
Airbus keeps pushing for a negoitiated settlement with the U.S. (and the U.S. only, by my understanding). I would understand such a negotiation would have no bearing on China, Japan, Brazil or Canada (nor any other potential airframe producing country) in any way. How would this play out in the future vis a vis complaints and counter complaints on all levels?
Airliners.net has the hilarity exposed quite nicely:
Airbus Claims WTO Victory
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/4753626/
Boeing Claims WTO Win Over Airbus
http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/general_aviation/read.main/4753678/
The two major issues which could have been affected by a WTO finding are the US Tanker Contract and the future financing of the A350.
The Pentagon says it will not consider the preliminary WTO report but the underlying politics of the contract may be affected nontheless.
Europe has brazenly moved foward with governmental financing of the A350 despite these findings but can do so under the cover of the pending findings against Boeing.
In truth, for the time being, the WTO is like some cloudy weather in the distance but there is no rain in the forecast and the wind is moving the clouds very slowly